logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.20 2016나2063768
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a dismissal or an additional or supplementary determination as follows with respect to the part, etc. for which the plaintiff claims an additional appeal as the grounds for appeal, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

2. The third side of the judgment of the first instance, “forest” of the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 3, 14, as “forest” and “B” of the fourth side of the first instance judgment of 5,002, “B” before and after the 5,002 lower day of 5,00,000,000,000 won “5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00.

2. Additional or supplementary judgment

A. The summary of the grounds of appeal 1) The seller’s name and resident registration number are indicated in the seller’s column of the real estate sales contract (Evidence No. 1) concerning the forest of this case, and the name column is indicated in the name column, and the H’s personal name is affixed in the seal column, and some notes, such as the “SJ”, “A clan clan Association”, “president”, and “General Justice J”, are written differently in the seal column, etc., the above contract cannot be ruled out to be operated for the trial of this case. 2) Many outside persons among the graves located in the forest of this case.

arrow