logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.10.16 2014고단950
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the defendant alters the password of the studio entrance of the victim B, the defendant had the mind that the victim would make a telephone to change the password of the above entrance to another number.

On May 1, 2014, the Defendant classified the password of the digital escape register installed in the studio entrance of the victim in Jinju-si, Jin-si, and infringed on the victim's residence, thereby impairing its utility by changing the password of the said digital escape register.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B Application of the police protocol protocol law

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. No person who is charged with the relevant part of the facts constituting the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection shall repeatedly send codes, words, sound, images, or motion pictures creating fears or apprehensions to other persons;

Nevertheless, the victim B knew that he had been living with the victim and demanded that he be the male and another male, but the victim had a good appraisal on the ground that the victim refused it. On April 30, 2014, around 02:09, the victim sent text messages to the phone phone No. 1253, stating that the victim had been living with the victim, and then the victim had a good appraisal on the ground that the victim refused it.

The Defendant, including that, from around 10:58 to around 10:58 of the same day, sent text messages that cause apprehensions to the above victim, such as the crime sight slip.

2. We examine the judgment, and the facts charged in the above part are the information and communications network.

arrow