logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.10 2011가합123587
분양대금반환 등
Text

1. All of the instant claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The basic facts are the project implementation company that newly built and sold the apartment B (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”) in Chungcheongbuk-gun, Inc., and the original construction company is the contractor.

The Plaintiffs are those who purchase the instant apartment from Defendant A Co., Ltd.

[Specific contents of the sale contract are as shown in the attached Table 2 list [1] Some of the plaintiffs succeeded to the status of the seller under the consent of the defendants.

② The amount of supply stated in “supply” was set as follows on the basis of the amount of apartment supply, which is the options contract (finite expansion and einite-type air supply) supplied, as the pure apartment supply price:

However, the Plaintiff C entered into a contract for options to expand balcony in KRW 5,750,000, and KRW 4,750,000, respectively.

(B) Subparagraph 8-12,61). Items 517,510,00 won for apartment supply 417,980,00 won for 402,370,000 won for 359,720,000 won for balcony expansion of 16,540,500,000 won for 11,500,000 won for balcony extension of 11,500 won for 9,500,500,000 won for 9,500,500,000 won for 9,50,000,000 won for 9,50,000 won for 5,000 won for 7,000,000 won for 7,000 won for 11,50,000 won for balcony extension of balcony.

③ In the case of the Plaintiffs who did not conclude the option contract, the Plaintiffs indicated the term “uncontractual”.

2) The Plaintiffs paid the down payment, intermediate payment, etc. in accordance with each of the instant sales contracts:

(E) All of the plaintiffs received a loan of intermediate payments from an agricultural cooperative on the basis of the defendants' good offices. Specific payment details are as shown in the attached Table 2). / [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul No. 1, 8, 9, and all of the arguments

2. The parties' assertion

A. The content of the advertisement of the plaintiffs in this case ① the overall view of lakes, ② the installation of the lubsium and fountains in lakes, ③ the construction of the outer fences outside apartment buildings, ④ the construction of underground parking lots, ⑤ the expansion of balcony limited to the buyers entering into options contracts, and vi) the opening of E schools.

arrow