logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.06.24 2014고단2813
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In around 200, the Defendant, upon becoming aware of the Victim C at the Internet club related to Telecommunications in 2000, introduced the Victim’s house as a pharmacist from around that time, maintained trust by introducing the Victim’s house, introducing the hospital as necessary for medical treatment, and providing the Victim’s parents with medical treatment. The Defendant also told the Victim at any time that “the parent and the son are a pharmacist who suffers from all accidents,” and “the degree of KRW KRW 00 billion for receiving building or miscarriage.”

At around 2010, the Defendant was aware that the parents of the above victim sold Seongdong-gu Seoul where the parents of Seongdong-gu had been redevelopmented, and that the Defendant possessed the amount of KRW 50 million, and was able to obtain it by deception under the name of investment money, etc.

1. Around May 19, 2010, the defrauded of the investment funds in the corporate bond business against the victim C with the “G” restaurant operated by the victim F of the victim F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu. “C is raising a lot of money by making full investments in the loan company, including the operation of the “G” restaurant operated by the victim F of the victim F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and family members are raising a lot of money. We also call to grant 30 million won interest income every month if it is invested to the extent of KRW 30 million. The principal is to return at any time.”

However, the facts are that the husband of the defendant did not operate the lending business, and the defendant has invested in the lending business operated by the person with a special relationship, but the defendant has failed to pay profits more than 3% per month, so it was difficult to pay the profits promised even if invested in the lending business with the money of the victim C, and there was no intention or ability to return the principal at any time upon request of the victim C.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant deceiving the victim C and deceiving it from the victim C on May 19, 2010, KRW 3,500,000 around July 1, 2010, KRW 6,200,000 around July 1, 2010, KRW 12,00,000 around August 9, 2010, and KRW 4,000 around October 4, 2010.

arrow