A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and nine months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on March 31, 2008, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on March 31, 2008. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 6, 2016.

The defendant is the chief director of D, a foundation corporation located in Gangnam-gu Seoul and the second floor.

1. On November 2010, the Defendant against the victim E obtained a loan of KRW 500 million from the Saemaul Treasury which is permitted within the inside of the Republic of Korea to the victim E, and the victim E received a loan of KRW 500 million due to lack of appraisal fees, entertainment expenses, serial expenses, etc., and D may receive a loan of KRW 500 million from the Saemaul Treasury because it is possible to receive a loan, if it lends money to the Republic of South Africa because it is short of funds for D to assist with the preferential means in Korea.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time, the defendant was suffering from serious financial difficulties to the extent that he could not pay the monthly salary of D, and there was no plan to receive a loan of KRW 500 million from the Saemaul Treasury, so even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant obtained a total of KRW 10 million from the injured party on November 1, 2010, KRW 5 million on the same month, KRW 5 million on the 28th of the same month, and KRW 17 million on July 2, 2011, and acquired it by fraud.

2. The Defendant against the victim F may, on June 12, 2012, lend KRW 50 million to the victim F through G and H, at the mutual infinite coffee shop located below the Party D at the time of Manpopo-si on June 12, 2012. In this context, the Defendant may sufficiently resolve the amount of KRW 50 million.

If money is raised before the date of the settlement of the bill, it shall return 50 million won.

A false statement was made to the effect that the promissory note at a discount of KRW 100 million was leased KRW 50 million.

However, the above bill can be settled normally by the bill borrowed free of charge from J, the defendant (State) who is a party to I.