logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단913
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties at the Seongdong-gu District Court on September 2, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seongdong-gu District Court on September 2, 2012. On October 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Northern District Court on September 17, 2013 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seongdong-gu District Court on September 17, 2013

At around 03:00 on January 21, 2014, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (the 47-year-old) of the victim’s chest one time on drinking, on the ground that the victim E (the 47-year-old) was not promptly repaid the money borrowed from the Defendant, and the victim was able to walk the victim two times on the floor and walk the victim two times on the floor, which requires a closure for about three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the status of investigation into criminal records, investigation into criminal records, and investigation and confinement by individual;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. For the reason that Article 35 of the Criminal Act is too minor for sentencing, sentence of punishment is inevitable considering the following: (a) the victim was scambling, the scambling of the victim, and the scambling of the victim is not good; and (b) even though there are many criminal convictions of the same kind, the crime of this case is committed during the period of repeated crime,

On the other hand, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime are against the victim, and other circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, etc. shall be determined as ordered

arrow