The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of this case (e.g., the instant crime was committed within the period of two months after the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant has already been sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime. In light of all the circumstances, it is unfair that the sentence of the lower court (a prison term of four months) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendant on December 23, 201, when considering the following: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to 16 times of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act in Daejeon District Court on December 23, 2011; and (b) the Defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, which is within two months after the completion of the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon District Court on November 10, 201, in view of the following: (c) the Defendant 1 was injected in a scinant scinary scinant scinant scinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscinscins

However, it includes the fact that the defendant had been receiving medical treatment by attending the hospital periodically after the release, and had expressed the will of rehabilitation and rehabilitation while faithfully working as a selective distribution employee for living, and that the defendant would be more reasonable to give the defendant an opportunity for medical treatment and rehabilitation than being detained for a long period of time, considering the situation that the elderly's father who works in daily labor was unable to receive wages properly.