logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.05.19 2016고단110
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a △ restaurant operated by the victim D (56 taxes, n) on or around 21:10 on January 21, 2016; and (b) at a △ restaurant under the influence of alcohol, the victim was not well aware of the lusium in the course of calculating the lusium under the influence of alcohol.

On the ground of misunderstanding the victim's misunderstanding, the victim's head was 3 times on the left side of the victim's drinking, and frightened to the drinking door, leading the victim, leading him to the victim, and she was able to get off three times on the beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table.

The Defendant continued to hold the head of the victim at one time on account of the main disease, which is a dangerous object on his table, and again gets the head of the victim. However, the Defendant left the victim's left hand, etc. one time, which prevented him from doing so, and got the victim to be treated for about seven days.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

On January 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:35, 2016, the Defendant: (b) at the restaurant, “G’s 21:35, the Victim F (50 years old, n) operation” in the E apartment commercial building; (c) on the ground that the victim, who was seated on the table table of the Defendant, tolds the Victim who was drinking and drinking alcohol on the house, and caused the Victim’s injury, such as the damage of the nives of two feees, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the left side of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the crime of this case is not good.

arrow