The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (five million won penalty) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: (a) Although there are favorable grounds for sentencing, such as the fact that the Defendant led to a confession of a part of the crime at the lower court and recognized the remainder in the trial; and (b) the degree of injury or interference with business was not serious, there were nine times the past records of punishment for violent crimes, which were sentenced nine times, and three times, which were sentenced to a fine, and the victim did not agree with the victim; and (b) in particular, the crime of injury in this case was committed on March 10, 2013 and was committed during the repeated period after the execution of imprisonment with prison labor was completed; (c) comprehensively taking into account all matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the punishment of the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (d) there is no additional change in circumstances in the trial. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.