logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.06.21 2016고단1902
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

3...

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 1, 2015 to March 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated a “C” business with approximately 165 square meters located in Daegu-gu B and fourth floors; and (b) employed female employees, including D, and had female employees receive 130,000 won in cash per time from the male who is unable to know the name of the guest, such as two police officers, and had them attend with the said male and female employees, and (c) paid money of KRW 80,000 won per time out of the sexual traffic amount received from customers to gain profits of KRW 25,40,000,000 for each female employee.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Attachment of field photographs and application of statutes on business registration certificates;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing after Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection of Sex Acts;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area of the brokerage of sexual traffic by business (from June to January 4) (the person who has no special sentencing seal];

2. Consideration - Considering the circumstances: The appeal that the Defendant was committed in the instant case while he was unable to find any means of livelihood based on his age due to reflectivity, young entertainment, and the circumstances of engaging in the instant entertainment business; the unfavorable circumstances: the Defendant’s age, sex, health conditions, home environment, motive, means, consequence, etc.; all of the other factors of sentencing specified in the records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, health conditions, home environment, motive, means, and circumstances

arrow