1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, jointly and severally with Nonparty C, is within the scope of property inherited from the network D, 14,32.

1. The plaintiff asserts that the cause of the claim in this case is as stated in the attached Form “amended cause of claim” and “amended cause of claim.”

2. Defendant A shall be deemed to have led to the confession of the facts as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim (as to the Plaintiff’s assertion of “the cause of the changed claim” premised on Defendant A’s simple heir, the above Defendant was liable only within the scope of inherited property, and thus, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was liable within the scope of inherited property, by reflecting the Plaintiff’s assertion made by the said Defendant A, and by reflecting the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim, and accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted “the cause of the corrected claim” as to the claim. On March 3, 200, the aforementioned Defendant did not submit a separate reply, and did not appear on the date of pleading). The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff

4. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is accepted in entirety.

However, in relation to the costs of lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s defense that Defendant A had obtained approval of the inheritance limit while seeking simple performance of the original obligation succeeded to by the Defendant, and accordingly, the Plaintiff should bear one half each of the parts issued between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, taking into account the circumstances in which the claim and the cause of the claim were modified by reflecting the defense.