logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.01.16 2018나10082
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's rehabilitation claims against B are KRW 55,039,646 upon a request for change at the trial.

Reasons

A. The reasoning for the reasoning is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (except for the part of the opinion), which is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, after deducting any addition or dismissal below. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

In addition, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was written by adding or adding, is changed to B from among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.

Part II of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance

B. (2) The second sentence of paragraph (2) (hereinafter the third sentence 13) is as follows. In full view of the overall purport of pleadings in the entries in Section 4, 5, 13 through 16, evidence Nos. 17-2, and evidence Nos. 8 (6-7) of Section B, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff supplied “No. 9T8*208” on November 11, 2017 pursuant to the order of materials No. 10, 2017 (Evidence No. 6). Accordingly, B is obligated to pay the price of KRW 39,085,200 in return.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff supplied “The 12T*8*20 18” on November 13, 2017 only with the evidence of evidence Nos. 4, 13, and 16 to B, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Meanwhile, in November 20, 2017, "Chapter B, 12T*8*201, 25T*8*201, 25T*8*201, 25T*201,") is different from the order of materials (Evidence B-6) on November 10, 2017 and its specifications, even if the Plaintiff supplied the said iron plates to B, it is not possible to claim the payment therefor. Furthermore, even in addition to each description in the evidence Nos. 4, 7, and 17, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the said iron plates were supplied to B, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the amount for which B's obligation to pay is recognized is KRW 39,085,200.

Part II of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance

B. 4) b) b) 3 (the second sentence below the second sentence) (the second sentence below the second sentence) is examined, the plaintiff can find out the details of the order ordered to the defendant even after examining all the orders around that time.

arrow