logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2019.02.15 2017가합101985
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On September 10, 2009, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) issued a promissory note with the addressee as H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) and with the face value of at least 1.4 billion won (hereinafter “instant promissory note gold claim”), and a notary public prepared a notarial deed as No. 66 of 1209 and delivered it to H.

(hereinafter “instant authentic deed”). On May 31, 2013, H transferred the instant promissory note gold claims against G to J on the same day, and notified G on the same day. On October 25, 2015, J again transferred the instant promissory note gold claims to the Plaintiff, the representative director of H, and then notified G.

Defendant D and E were to have engaged in credit business from May 2006 to “LE” with the trade name “LE at Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K.” Defendant E served as a director of G from July 3, 2008 to September 12, 2008, and Defendant D was to have the representative director of G from July 9, 2008 to pay 12 billion won to Defendant B for the most payment under Defendant B’s proposal. Defendant D was to have the total amount of KRW 1.2 billion from the above 12 billion from the above 8 billion capital to the above 4 billion capital from the 1.5 billion capital from Seoul Jung-gu branch office (“Seoul”) around August 11, 2008; Defendant E deposited the above 8 billion capital from the above 1.8 billion capital from the 1.3 billion capital from the above 8 billion capital from the her husband’s account for the payment of new capital; Defendant E deposited the above 8 billion capital from the above 8.1.2 billion capital from the above 8 billion capital from the above bank’s account.

arrow