Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months or two years or more with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on June 30, 2016 and the same year.

7. 8. The punishment becomes final and conclusive and is currently under suspension of execution;

On February 14, 2017, the Defendant, without a driver’s license of a motor vehicle around 13:00, driven a Dunstun motor vehicle at approximately 4 km from the 1606 Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong to the 1308 Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong at the same time without a driver’s license of the motor vehicle at around 13:0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a report on investigation (Attachment to the judgement, etc.);

1. Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act lies in a person having a previous driver’s license for the reason of sentencing. While the Defendant had a disadvantageous condition for driving without a license during the suspension period due to driving without license or driving under drinking, in light of the criminal records of the Defendant, the main reason for which the previous decision of suspension of execution was rendered appears to be due to driving without license rather than driving without license. The criminal facts of the instant case are relatively low in social risks compared to driving without license. The Defendant is only one time, except for the previous driver’s license for the previous driver’s license, and is against the fact that the previous driver’s license was imposed, and the Defendant is driving without license for the purpose of life while operating the adult product store. The Defendant appears to have been trying to not repeat the previous driver’s license for the purpose of carrying out the duty of life, and the Defendant appears to have faithfully performed the duty of social service without good faith, etc. under the protection of the previous decision.