1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff, at the time of July 27, 1994, went to the spirit of the hospital established and operated by the Defendant Educational Foundation C (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) at the address of symptoms, such as memory, accident history, and concentration decrease and apprehensions from half a year ago, etc.

Defendant B diagnosed the Plaintiff as a mental divided disease, and from the same day, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the mental and stability ward of the Defendant Hospital until September 28, 1994, and was hospitalized for two months during the period of hospitalization.

On December 21, 1994, the Plaintiff re-entered to the outside of the Defendant Hospital and received hospitalized treatment from the same date until December 30, 1994, and thereafter, from June 8, 1995 to June 21, 1995, from April 4, 1997 to April 8, 197, and from January 26, 198 to May 6, 198, the Plaintiff was provided three times more and more hospitalized treatment, and the Plaintiff was provided several times from January 26, 1998 to the outside of the emergency room or as part of the emergency room.

Since then, the Plaintiff received hospital treatment and outpatient treatment on several occasions from a national hospital, Seoul National University Hospital, etc. from around 1999 to around 201, and continued to undergo outpatient treatment and medication treatment in Seoul National University Hospital from around 2012.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, the entries in Gap's 3, 6, 8, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff is living a normal workplace in a physical and healthy condition without any disability. Around 1994, there was symptoms showing the back part of head of head around 1994, and received hospitalized treatment, etc. due to the plaintiff's visit to the defendant hospital.

However, even if there is no mental problem until around that time, Defendant B, who was the head of the department at the time, prescribed a wrong medicine by misunderstanding the plaintiff who could have been sufficiently recovered from only simple treatment, and the plaintiff was seriously ill after being treated as a pharmacologic at the defendant hospital.