The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. 판단 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당하다( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조). 동종 범행으로 여러 차례 처벌( 벌 금형, 집행유예) 을 받은 전력이 있음에도 불구하고 다시 반복하여 범행을 저지른 점, 이 사건 각 범행은 이른바 ‘ 주 취 폭력( 주 폭, 酒暴) ’으로서 주변 이웃과 선량한 시민들에게 불안감을 일으키고 사회의 평온을 저해한다는 점에서 죄질이 좋지 않은 점, 업무 방해 범행으로 당시 현장에 있던 손님들이 나가는 등 그 영업 방해의 정도가 경미하다고

The fact that it cannot be done is an unfavorable circumstance.

On the other hand, however, it is recognized that the crime is committed and against it is being committed, and again, it does not repeat such crime.

The court below's punishment is somewhat unreasonable if it takes into account the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the amount of damage caused by the crime of fraud is a small amount, the defendant compensates the victims for the damage caused by the fact that the victims do not want the punishment against the defendant, and the victims do not want the punishment against the defendant, other circumstances that are conditions for the punishment under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and the equality with the punishment in the same similar case as the case in this case, etc.

We accept the defendant's argument of sentencing department.

3. As the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal by the defendant is again decided as follows.

【Inasmuch as the facts constituting an offense and the summary of evidence recognized by the court are identical to the facts constituting an offense and the summary of evidence, it shall be governed by Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.