logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.07.12 2016고단2449
업무상배임
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 4, 2001 to July 30, 201, the Defendant, located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government No. 18 Dong 148 and 148, operated by the victim company of the E and F couple, engaged in business activities and cost management in the “G” company (G). The supply industry of electronic office supplies has formed a sensitive market for the prices of products, among the companies that set a very small margin per product and are located in the vicinity of the mountain and diving room.

Although there is an occupational duty to make every effort to maximize the business of the victim company because the defendant was in charge of the business belonging to the victim company, he thought to obtain personal profits using various information acquired through the victim company. On June 11, 2009, the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government established "I" corporation operating the business of selling electronic expendable goods, such as the victim company, at the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around June 11, 2009, let theJ, who is fit for the victim company, act as a representative in its name, and inform the J of information and the price of the transaction, and so, he did not request the victim company's customer business owner to assist him to purchase the I product, or introduced the I product to the price lower than the products of the victim company, thereby inducing the former customer business owner of the victim company to purchase the I product by means of supplying electronic expendable goods to the customer company in accordance with the direction of the defendant and managing the funds of the victim company.

From June 11, 2009 when the Defendant established I, from around July 30, 201 to around July 30, 2014, the Defendant breached its duty as seen above, and caused the Defendant’s total sales of KRW 25.5 billion to I, thereby incurring property damage equivalent to the total amount of KRW 255,057,428 during the said period to the victim company, and through I, the Defendant incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 145,624,967.

arrow