logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.01 2017고단8208
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 2.5 million won or more for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on October 29, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 3 million won or more for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on October 29, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 3 million won or more for a crime

On December 2, 2017, the Defendant driven B rocketing car from around 00:17, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.118% during blood, to the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the 599 regular survey distance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the arrest of the case, a report on the situation of the main driver's operation and a report on the situation of the main driver;

1. Notice of the result of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. Records of judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, inquiry report, and investigation report (the previous confirmation of the past records), such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is deemed to have been committed by the defendant who has been under the influence of driving under the influence of drinking more than twice, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime. The defendant was punished by a fine due to driving under the influence of drinking in 2008, which caused traffic accidents while driving under the influence of drinking in 2010. In 2012, he was punished by a fine due to failing to comply with the measurement of drinking and was punished by a fine for failing to comply with the measurement of drinking in 2016. In 2016, even if he was punished by a fine without the influence of driving under the influence of driving under the influence of driving without permission, there is a lot of possibility of criticism.

However, there is no history that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and that the defendant has been punished for a traffic crime for the past ten years.

arrow