Defendants are not guilty.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant B was a person who completed a marriage report with F on September 10, 1987 and operated H in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, while Defendant B was a person who operated H in Yangcheon-gu.

1) At around 11:00 on December 30, 2012, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with A and one time at the H H’s office. 2) On April 4, 2013, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with A around 20:0 on April 4, 2013, Gangseo-gu Seoul Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul.

In this respect, the defendant was sent to A and each other over two occasions.

B. Defendant A with knowledge that he is a person who is a spouse of the above B.

At the same time, at the same place as the paragraph, two times of sexual intercourses, respectively.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a general criminal trial is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence with probative value that leads the judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do4737 delivered on February 24, 2006, etc.). B.

1) The Defendants, on December 30, 2012, 2012, were sexual intercourses with each other. As such, the Defendants, on December 30, 2012, had to express the date, time, place, and method of each sexual intercourses, to make it distinguishable from other facts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do1014, Jun. 24, 2005).

3) In the case of direct evidence corresponding to this part of the facts charged, I (at around 1:00 on December 30, 2012, there was a statement in the investigative agency of the defendant B and in this court, but considering the following circumstances.