1. The Defendants and Defendant He, the litigant’s litigant’s lawsuit, shall enter the Plaintiff in the attached Form on the AM 303 square meters in Busan-gun, Busan-gun.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties:

(Defendant AI is deemed to be a confession).

In order to create a relocation complex, 31 residents of the area incorporated into the NN site (hereinafter referred to as the "first owners") have jointly purchased 17,254m2 (hereinafter referred to as "land before division") in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and completed the registration of co-ownership in the name of 26 of them.

B. After the subdivision, the land before subdivision was divided into several parcels, such as Busan-gun AP, Busan-gun, and it is also one of the lots where the AM-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. The plaintiff and the defendants (including I who is the litigation taking-off of the defendant network H; hereinafter the "defendants") are currently co-owned share holders of each share in the land of this case, and each share of the defendants is as shown in the attached Form.

(2) On the other hand, Defendant 6, 10, 17, 20, 20, 11, 11, and 16 asserted that the registration of co-ownership of the Plaintiff and the Defendants with respect to the instant land was a co-ownership relationship under a mutual title trust, and that the registration of co-ownership by the Plaintiff and the Defendants was a co-ownership relationship under a mutual title trust is a co-ownership relationship under a mutual title trust.

Therefore, the key issue of this case is whether a sectional co-ownership relationship is established with respect to the land of this case, that is, whether co-owners have identified each location and area and have exclusive sectional ownership.

3. In full view of the facts and circumstances under the judgment below, it is recognized that the first owner of the instant land formed a sectionally owned co-ownership relationship by specifying each location and area of the instant land exclusively divided ownership, and that the sectionally owned co-ownership relationship has continued until the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

Therefore, the Defendants fall under each of the annexed sheet concerning the instant land to the Plaintiff.