A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CP car.

On January 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:40, while driving the vehicle at around the 08:40, the Defendant continued the intersection from the Gongju-do to the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the west and the tent.

At the time, the vehicle of the defendant driving tried to change the course to a two-lane in order to turn on the right side the vehicle that started prior to the arrival of a signal while stopping for signal waiting at the first lane, and the vehicle of the victim D(20 years old) driving is in the speed of about 116km per hour through the two-lane.

In such cases, when a vehicle driver changes a lane to a person engaged in driving service, he/she shall change the lane by taking into account the traffic conditions of the front and rear, and he/she has a duty of care to not change the lane to an intersection near the intersection where a white real line is installed.

In the facts charged, on the premise that the defendant did not turn on the direction direction, etc., it is stated that if the defendant changes the lane, he/she would be in violation of the duty of care prior to notifying the direction of the direction by hand or direction flag, etc., but the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone did not turn on the direction direction, etc.

It is difficult to readily conclude that the facts charged are modified and recognized.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and attempted to change his course to closely, and the damaged vehicle, which had gone into the diversing place, immediately left to the right in order to avoid collision with the Defendant’s vehicle and failed to move to the right, thereby receiving the boundary stone on the frontway, and then receiving the telecommunication line.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, sustained injury to the victim in the lower half that requires medical treatment of about 14 weeks, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures such as aiding the damaged person.

(i) the evidence;