1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,314,002 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 17, 2015 to December 13, 2016, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant, at the Hongcheon-gun, lent to customers the GaTVba (ATV) in the Gangseo-gun Hongcheon-gun, is running a business to allow the Defendant, a place for lending, a place for lending, to experience driving of the riverine gravel field with approximately 2 km from the riverine, which is about 2 km in front of the Defendant Company, in front of the Defendant Company.

B. At around 15:00 on August 16, 2014, the Plaintiff, along with his family members, moved from the Defendant to drive it, and tried to avoid a vehicle, which was opened from the entrance of the night amusement park, to the shot-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Gocheon-gun, in the form of a shot-gun, the leader belonging to the Defendant, with the intent to avoid the vehicle, at the entrance of the night amusement park, on the shot-gun, and operated the steering gear to the right side, and then the Plaintiff was driving the steering gear to the right side of the shot-gun, which was set back by the driver (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. The point where the instant accident occurred was a place where vehicles entering the lower side of the automobile, and the Defendant was well aware of such circumstances.

The Plaintiff was not holding a driver’s license at the time of the instant accident.

After leasing the Sho-Ba, the plaintiff was engaged in a simple driving practice before the defendant's employee is viewed as the defendant's employee, and the experience began immediately.

E. The Plaintiff suffered injury due to the instant accident, she was suffering from the injury of the blood ties with external wounds, the upper left-hand body body pelke, the crypus crypium, the crypium attached to a complex of backsides, the kypium for the stability of L1st century and L4 pressure stalpium (closed).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 16-19, Gap evidence 21, Gap evidence 29, Gap evidence 31, Gap evidence 33, Eul evidence 1-4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. In the event that a person who has failed to drive his/her car drivess, the Defendant is running a business to lend his/her carto the customer with the risk of the accident and allow him/her to experience driving the car. Therefore, the Defendant is running an experience activity.