1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 26, 2002, the Plaintiff’s husband (CB, hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) entered the Daol Land Co., Ltd. and was working as a wood soldier on the “DD Corporation” constructed by the Net Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D Corporation”), and was recognized as an occupational accident by the Defendant on November 30, 2003, and was under medical care until November 30, 2003, and became subject to class 7 subparag. 4 of the disability grade.

B. The Deceased, around August 2014, caused a thrings of thrings, and the brings of brings were combined, resulting in the booming of the brings, which received boomings at the Tol University Seoul Epia Hospital on December 22, 2014.

The Deceased was under re-explosion after the surgery and was under re-explosion on the following day, but died due to multi-explosion around 10:34 on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes an occupational accident and filed a claim for survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses with the Defendant. However, on May 21, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral funeral expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the deceased’s death and the approved injury of the deceased.

Although the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the instant disposition, the Defendant dismissed it on October 16, 2015, and the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the said Committee dismissed it on March 2, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff alleged the death of the deceased has aggravated the eutic blood cells increase symptoms, which were the causes of the death of the deceased, and caused the death of the deceased, and thus there is a proximate causal relation with the approved branch.

B. 1) The Deceased’s symptoms show symptoms coming from November 26, 2002 to the left arms.