logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.04.12 2012고단1125
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2012, the Defendant driven a cargo truck B as of September 11, 201:0 and proceeded two lanes ahead of the 253km along the Western Highway, which is located in the city of fraud at the time, along the right side from Seoul to the neck.

At that time, there was a red X-ray light showing the prohibition of running a variable, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well in the front and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the person engaged in driving service and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the front city and proceeding with a variable lane in violation of the new subparagraph. The Defendant received from the victim C(57 years of age) who was temporarily stopped on a variable lane as part of the fronter part of the said cargo vehicle. The Defendant suffered from the victim E (44 years of age) who was on board the said bus with approximately 3 weeks of multiple sprinkl, etc., for which treatment of approximately 4 weeks is required for approximately 2 weeks; the Defendant sustained from the victim E (70 years of age) the injury such as cream, tension, etc. in need of treatment; the Defendant sustained from the victim F (70 years of age) about 4 weeks of the injury, such as external brain sprinklosis and sprinkl; the injury to the victim G(75 years of age); the victim’s injury, such as the victim’s injury requiring open treatment for about 4 weeks in advance; the victim’s injury to the victim E (53 years of age age of age); the victim’s injury necessary for treatment of approximately 534 years of age frame.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement of I, F, G, H and E;

1. A traffic accident actual condition survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act

arrow