The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent administrative authority on April 201 to July 12, 201, set up a wall with a general steel structure and a prefabricated board in the area of 322 square meters from the beginning of April 201 to the beginning of July 12, 2011, and newly constructed a single-story building in the area of 322 square meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Written statements and written accusations;

1. The reference inquiry report;

1. Application of statutes, such as photographs;

1. Article 110 of the Building Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 110 subparagraph 1 and 11 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of Fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Around April 15, 2005, the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Procedure Act, knowing that the Defendant obtained approval of factory construction under the Industrial Cluster Development and Factory Establishment Act and obtained permission of factory construction under the said Act, and completed the civil engineering work on the instant land with the knowledge that it would be deemed that the Defendant obtained permission of factory construction under the said Act. However, as the Defendant delayed new construction of a factory due to the wind to file a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration of the instant land due to a dispute with the land seller, the Defendant was notified of the cancellation of factory construction due to the delay of factory construction from the local economy of the office inside and outside of Pyeongtaek-si office and the regional economy of the local economy of the branch office and the local economy of November 22, 2010, after submitting a written opinion on the factory

However, with the notification from the director of the building office that the land of this case is impossible to construct because of the restriction area on development activities in the building department of Pyeongtaek-si Office, the construction of the factory is likely to be revoked if some of the factory buildings are not installed, and therefore, the multi-level temporary building is to preserve the investment amount of 500 million won already invested by maintaining the effect of the approval of factory construction.