The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the record in light of the record, it is justifiable for the lower court to have upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the charged facts of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on standards for general restaurant business facilities under attached Table 14 of Article 36 of the Enforcement Rule of the Food

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.