logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.13 2016고단4380
주택법위반등
Text

Defendant

As to the violation of the Housing Act, A and B, each fine of KRW 500,000,00,000, and the violation of the authorized brokerage law in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall resell or arrange the resale of multi-family housing constructed and supplied by a project operator in a public housing site before the lapse of a period prescribed by Presidential Decree (hereinafter referred to as "period for restriction on resale"), among multi-family housing constructed and supplied by a project operator as residents of housing subject to provisional application.

1. Defendant A shall not engage in the business of arranging or exchanging, etc. certificates, etc. related to the sale, lease, etc. of real estate, the transfer, arrangement, etc. of which is prohibited by the relevant statutes, as a representative of the office of LA certified brokerage office in Sejong-si 101, who is Defendant A shall not engage in the business of buying and selling such certificates, etc.

On July 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arranged the status of being selected as the occupant on July 10, 2015, for sale to P through an employeeO, and received KRW 1 million in return, from the Defendant, on July 10, 2015, as to No. 615 and 608 of an apartment unit sold by M Co., Ltd. at the location of the above LA brokerage office, etc.

However, the above apartment was a house that could not resell or arrange the resale of the status of being selected as the occupant of the house for one year from the date ( July 15, 2015) on which it is possible to conclude the first housing supply contract, as a house subject to the application of the foregoing apartment system, developed by an administrative-oriented complex construction project pursuant to the Special Act on the Construction of a Consolidated City in the Yeong-Gongju Area for Follow-up Measures for the Follow-up Measures for the New Administrative Capital.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with theO on July 2015, mediated the resale of the status of being selected as the occupant of the housing subject to the restriction on resale within the period of restriction on resale, and mediated the sale and purchase or exchange of certificates, etc. related to the sale, lease, etc. of real estate, the transfer, arrangement, etc. of which is prohibited under related statutes, or conducted the business of buying and selling them

In addition, the Defendant conspired with O on July 2015 to October 10, 2015, and all of the following methods are four times as shown in attached Table 1.

arrow