Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 16:00 on October 1, 2013, at its own house located in Sung-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City 4.311, a sexual intercourse with D and takes place in the bed with D while taking part in the bed. A, a male-friendly defendant A was found to have sexual intercourse with D on the wind coming from his own house at around 18:00 on the same day.

1. On Oct. 1, 2013, Defendant A instructed D to file a false complaint against D in order to maintain the relationship with B at a time in an irregular and irregular manner on Oct. 1, 2013, and had B file a false complaint against D.

Thus, on October 6, 2013, the Defendant called D and B at the coffee shop located in Daegu Metropolitan City, Seogu, and reported that “sexually abused persons” was 112, while talking about D and B, and made B prepare and submit a false statement and a written complaint with B as the transmission district located in the same Dong.

As a result, the defendant instigated B to punish D with the intention of having D punished.

2. On October 6, 2013, Defendant B drafted a written self-statement and a written complaint with respect to D, in accordance with the above A’s teachers, at the Song-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul.

The statement and the statement of the complaint are as follows: "A person who is the defendant D forced rape B on October 1, 2013, who is the complainant, to punish the complainant B"; and D had sexual intercourse with the defendant and had no fact of rape under the agreement with the defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant submitted a written report and a written complaint to a police officer who could not know the name of the above district police officer around that time.

In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Each police statement of the defendant B;

1. The Criminal Complaint Act and subordinate statutes;