The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (3 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, considering the fact that the trading order of the automobile trading business was disturbed due to the instant crime, and the damages may actually be inflicted on other business operators running the Internet advertisement in a legitimate manner, the liability for the instant crime is not easy, and the amount of vehicle information provided falsely is relatively large, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, behavior, environment, motive, background, method, frequency of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. 결론 따라서 피고인의 항소는 이유 없으므로, 형사 소송법 제 364조 제 4 항에 의하여 이를 기각하기로 하여, 주문과 같이 판결한다[ 다만, 원심판결 중 범죄 사 실란 제 2 행의 ‘ 판매 잗’ 은 ‘ 판매자’ 의, 법령의 적용 란 제 2 행의 ‘ 자동차 관리법’ 은 ‘ 구 자동차 관리법 (2015. 12. 29. 법률 제 13686호로 개정되기 전의 것)’ 의 오기 임이 명백하므로, 형사소송규칙 제 25조 제 1 항에 의하여 직권으로 이를 ‘ 판매자’, ‘ 구 자동차 관리법 (2015. 12. 29. 법률 제 13686호로 개정되기 전의 것)’ 로 각 경정한다].