logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.26 2016가단21686
제3자이의
Text

1. On June 9, 2016, the Defendant based on the authentic copy of the mediation protocol with executive force of the Gwangju District Court 2005 Ghana 269416.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. On April 7, 2006, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against Gwangju District Court 2005Gapo369416, and filed a lawsuit against Gwangju District Court 2005Gaporo369416, and the conciliation was concluded to pay KRW 2,00,000 to the Defendant by May 31, 2006.

According to the original protocol on June 9, 2016, the defendant executed seizure of the attached list in the Gwangju Mine-gu D, 305 Dong 601, in accordance with the original protocol on the conciliation of the defendant.

B. The Plaintiff asserts that the items listed in the attached attachment list are owned by the Plaintiff, and seeks the Defendant’s refusal of compulsory execution.

2. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 2, among the items listed in the attached attachment list, the seizure number Nos. 2, 3, 5, and 6 among the items listed in the attached attachment list are either purchased by the Plaintiff at the auction of corporeal movables or purchased by the Plaintiff at the sales store on or around April 12, 2013. Therefore, the Defendant’s compulsory execution premised on the ownership of C cannot be permitted.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the remaining articles are owned by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that they are owned by the plaintiff.

In the plaintiff's claim of this case, the part demanding the denial of compulsory execution of corporeal movables against corporeal movables 2, 3, 5, and 6 shall be quoted, and the remaining plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed.

arrow