beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 13,347,177 and as a result, from May 12, 2010 to July 30, 2013.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff, on January 29, 2009, lent KRW 50 million to Defendant B at the interest rate of KRW 50 million per month and the due date of repayment on December 29, 2008. At that time, Defendant C guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Plaintiff by Defendant B at the time, Defendant B paid the Plaintiff each of the money indicated in the column of “the date of repayment” corresponding to the number 1 to 12, 14 through 17, and 20 of the attached calculation statement to the Plaintiff. There is no dispute between the parties.
2. Determination as to the defendants' assertion of repayment
A. According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2-1 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3-1 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2-2, and 3-1 of the evidence, witness D, and E’s testimony, the defendant C’s testimony in the separate calculation statement can be recognized as the fact that the defendant C paid each of the money stated in the column of “the date of repayment” corresponding to the number Nos. 13, 18, and 19 of the separate calculation statement.
B. The Defendants asserted that Defendant B paid KRW 10,00,000 to the Plaintiff on January 21, 2008. Thus, Defendant B paid KRW 2,50,000 to the Plaintiff even after the said money was transferred to the Plaintiff. In light of the fact that Defendant B paid KRW 500,000 per month interest rate for 4 months, and that there was a large number of monetary transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as alleged by the Plaintiff, as alleged by the Plaintiff, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the payment only with the statement in subparagraph 1-3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and this part of the Defendants’ assertion is without merit. 2) The Defendants asserted that Defendant C repaid KRW 6,00,000 to the Plaintiff on May 23, 2010. Thus, it is insufficient to acknowledge it solely on the basis of the statement in No. 1, 2, or 3-3, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise. The Defendants’ assertion in this part of this case is without merit.
(M) According to the witness E’s testimony, the Defendants are found to have paid KRW 6,00,000 to the Plaintiff. The Defendants 3, Defendant C, on October 18, 2012, to the Plaintiff on February 2, 2012.