The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the fact that the Defendant was aware of and against the commission of the crime, and that there was no record of punishment for imprisonment, the instant crime is driving a vehicle that the Defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance without a driver’s license on April 2012 while under the influence of alcohol 0.142% under the influence of alcohol.

In full view of all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion is not reasonable since the sentence of the court below is too too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the victim of a traffic accident is subject to criminal punishment due to drinking or unlicensed driving; (b) the victim is under criminal punishment; (c) the victim is under criminal punishment; and (d) the victim is under criminal punishment due to drinking or unlicensed driving; and (d) the defendant is under criminal punishment conditions, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the defendant's assertion is not reasonable because he/she has been absent on June 20, 201 when he/she was issued with a warrant of detention on the sentenced date.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition