logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.16 2017고단51
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 2, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of three million won due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking) at the Jeju District Court. On February 4, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic law (drinking) and two years under suspension of execution.

In addition, on July 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) in the same court, and completed the execution of the sentence in Jeju prison on January 21, 2016.

[2] Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more due to driving of alcohol, on March 18, 2016, at around 21:40, the Defendant driven a vehicle with a gallon from approximately 3 km to C gallon in the direction of drinking at 1 0.131% of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol at around 21:40 on March 18, 2016.

"2017 Highest 1066"

1. On September 9, 2016, the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) had been punished twice or more due to drinking, driven a vehicle with C gallon from the front day of the soba-gu sobing restaurant at Jeju to the front day of the Jeju City, while under the influence of 0.076% of alcohol during blood, without obtaining a driver’s license on September 20, 2016.

2. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, carried out drinking and driving without a license as above, and controlled the Jeju Autonomous Police Organization E, which was under the jurisdiction of the Jeju Autonomous Police Organization, he would be punished for a serious repeated crime. As such, he would be able to do so as if the Defendant was F, who was aware of the same kind of repeated crime. The Defendant is “F” using a test-type pen in the driver column in the inquiry report as the result of the police officer’s report on the detection of the driver at the State, the statement of the situation of the driver at the State, and the report on the driver at the State, and the fact of regulating the driving of alcohol.

arrow