logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단7221
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On October 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six years in the Incheon District Court to robbery, and imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, which became final and conclusive on December 27, 2016.

【Criminal fact-finding on October 15, 2014, when the Defendant lent the name of the victim D to obtain the opening of the cell phone in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City’s mobile phone sales agency, the Defendant would not cause any damage by fully paying the cost of the mobile phone devices or the cost of using the cell phone if he/she lends the name to the victim D so that he/she can obtain the opening of the cell phone.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant was the bad credit holder at the time, opened a mobile phone from those in several hundreds of credit, and used it as living expenses, etc. immediately after opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim, and there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price normally.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceiving the victim as such, received a copy of the victim’s resident registration certificate from the injured party on the same day, and opened one cell phone sales agent of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E apartment commercial building 118 at around October 20, 2014. On November 7, 2014, the Defendant opened one cell phone sales agent of the victim’s name at the aforementioned “C” mobile phone sales agent. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant opened one cell phone sales agent of the victim’s name at the “H” mobile phone sales agent located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul and opened one cell phone sales agent of the victim’s name and immediately sold the said cell phone to the needy party, and did not pay the horse payment, etc., and thereby, the Defendant acquired the victim’s property benefits at KRW 3,476,170, the sum of KRW 160,000 and KRW 175,75,000 from the above date to July 15.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow