beta
Text
The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a vehicle B high-speed car.
On October 21, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol level of 0.072% 0.072% at around 21:20 on October 21, 2020, and led to the intersection of the D front distance in the south-gu C at the port of port to the sea from the intersection of the Ehh.
At night and there is a yellow light signal at that time, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle in a safe manner by looking at the right and the right and the right.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to exercise due diligence on the breath of alcohol, thereby being driven by the injured party F (the age of 64) who was working in the vicinity of the main body of the Gu, the Gu, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Gu, the Si, the Si, the Si, the Gu, the Si, the Si, the Gu, the Si,
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence above, destroyed the 4,396,137 won of the repair cost, immediately stopped and did not take necessary measures, such as providing personal information to the victim, and went away from the site.
2. On October 30, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, at the port support of the Daegu District Court, for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.
Nevertheless, the Defendant driven the said low-speed car while under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.072% at a section of about 100 meters after the police box of the same Gu from D next to D located in Nam-gu H at the time of the port of call as stated in paragraph (1).
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1.Notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, the statement of the circumstances of drinking drivers, and