Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On December 31, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gyeyang District Court of Suwon on December 31, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 16, 2019, at around 01:47, the Defendant driven a Dtibol car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 2.8 km from around the water source 270 to the front of the restaurant located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports (previous and confirmation) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order committed a second offense despite the fact that the defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving, and that the attitude of the crackdown police officers after the control of the defendant was considerably poor, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant. Meanwhile, the decision is delivered as the order, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is recognized and against the crime, the fact that the defendant does not have any traffic accident, the criminal record of the above drunk driving is a fine, the fact that there is no other criminal record, and the fact that the blood alcohol concentration is not high enough, and the fact that the blood alcohol concentration is considered favorable to the defendant.