A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 2092] The Defendant is a person who collects and lives a wave, etc.

On June 9, 2015, the Defendant, at the new site of the D Hospital parking lot located in Gui-si, Si around 01:30, loaded approximately eight meters of the market value of the victim E in Li-kina, and attempted to steals it, but did not bring about the e-kin and attempted to commit it.

[2015 Highest 2517]

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages is a holder of almost almost 49cc engine devices without registration.

On March 15, 2015, around 13:55, the Defendant driven the bicycle not covered by mandatory insurance in the state of alcohol concentration of about 0.063% from the 1km section to the G road located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the G road located in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a bicycle without registration 49c motors.

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, driven a bicycle with the motor device, and driven a road of four-lane in front of the Seoul FF G in Songpa-gu, Seoul, along one-lane from the station of the village to the center of the village.

Since there was a vehicle under a stop at the front door, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely, such as reducing speed and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system, etc., for those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded in the same way as it is, and instead, was found to have been the front wheel part of the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s driving with the part on the right-hand part of the victim H car owned by the victim H.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s foregoing occupational negligence to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 448,580, such as the maintenance of the exchange of a spread, is sufficient.