1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. The 24 households, including the Plaintiff, who was the sectional owners of both the Songpa-gu Seoul and E-ground tenements, have removed the existing apartment houses, and have to reconstruct the apartment houses with the second and sixth height above the ground (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”), and have promoted reconstruction by forming the reconstruction association (hereinafter “the reconstruction association of this case”). The Defendant was the head of the reconstruction association of this case, who assumed office on May 31, 2006, as the president of the reconstruction association of this case.

The reconstruction association of this case completed and registered the instant apartment B 202 under the name of three persons (F, G, and H) for the purpose of undergoing a completion inspection by combining the number of inconsistent households and the number of owners. The defendant was awarded a successful bid of the said 202 square meters in the name of a member I, who is a member of B, and agreed to use the said 1.8 square meters in the share of the site allocated in excess of the said 202 square meters to the members of B, and used the said 1.8 square meters in the name of the members of B, who agreed to recover the said 202 square meters, and received 6,000,000 won in each of the said 24 households and received 14,000,000 won in each of the said agreements, as well as failed to perform the said agreements.

In addition, the defendant filed a lawsuit claiming the return of deposit against the new bank and won the lawsuit at the first instance court, which became final and conclusive against the appellate court, and the defendant was unable to refund the deposit from the new bank, thereby causing property damage to the reconstruction association of this case.

In addition, the defendant arbitrarily disbursed KRW 10 million for the purpose of arranging the land adjustment agreement, in collusion with the F subject to criminal punishment, reduced the moving expenses without interest, and in collusion with F to redeem the personal loan at the association expense.

Plaintiff

Although the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) requested the Defendant to disclose data on the above issues over several times, the Defendant refused to comply therewith. The Defendant stated the purport of the claim that the instant reconstruction association is kept by the Plaintiff, etc.