logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.12.18 2014가합3584
수분양권양도확인
Text

1. The Defendants, based on the sales contract for the purchase and sale of the purchase price for the daily countermeasures of April 20, 2010 between the Plaintiff and the networkF, are the networkF.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Korea Land Corporation purchased from F on March 8, 2006 the land of this case 684 square meters prior to Sejong G (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On April 20, 2010, the Plaintiff purchased 14,000,000 won for the purchase of the purchase price of the land for administrative urban countermeasures that the Korea Land Corporation grants to F with respect to the instant land from F. However, even if the Plaintiff and F die, the Plaintiff and F’s statutory successors agreed to comply with the purchase and sale contract for the land for daily countermeasures (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

The plaintiff paid F the above 14,000,000 won to F on the same day.

(c) F was selected from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation that comprehensively took over the rights and obligations of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation on July 27, 201 as eligible for supply of land for livelihood countermeasures.

The F died on August 13, 2013, and the Defendants are legal successors of F (hereinafter “the deceased”).

E. Since the Defendants denied the conclusion of the instant agreement between the Plaintiff and the Deceased, the Plaintiff sought confirmation against the Defendants that the right to purchase the land for livelihood countermeasures granted by the Deceased from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation was transferred to the Plaintiff in accordance with the instant agreement.

2. Judgment made by deemed confession during the period of neighboring residence (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow