Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

The Defendant is the representative of “C organization” of a non-governmental organization.

On December 6, 2014, the Defendant posted the article of “L”, which, for the purpose of slandering Victim E, the representative of Non-Governmental Organization D’s “D organization,” the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Busan East-gu, Busan-gu, the Internet NAVG, and on the bulletin board of “H”, and on October 23 of the same year, J, the commander of “I” non-governmental organizations, cited the article of “L”, which, around October 23, 2014, reads the contents of the interview with the K press and the contents of the interview.

The contents are as follows: ① “The U.S. government first proposed the Dokdo Day among the representatives of the D groups organized by Japan who participated in the territory of the Republic of Korea in the Somathn Day commemorative Chapter,” ② “The U.S. government first proposed the Dokdo Day,” ② “The No. 9075, 4170, etc., at the signature movement site of the Republic of Korea, the representative of the D groups that took advantage of the history of the Dokdo Day,” and ③ even if the representative of the national organizations of the Republic of Korea should not create a new Dokdo Day, it was cited as attached to the second petition of the National Assembly’s Dokdo Day.”

In this regard, the representative of this organization tried to make a third petition to the 19th National Assembly by reducing the number of 11,120 petitioners again.

However, this was included in the phrase "the act of scambling the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea".

However, in fact, there was no honorable treatment from the Japanese side when the victim participated in the ceremony of the Dokdo Day on the Dokdo Day in Japan, or there was no fact that there was manipulating the signature record of 10 million won for the Dokdo Day, and that there was no fact that it used the minutes of the Dokdo group or fabricated the date of the minutes.

The purpose of this is to slander the defendant.