1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won and a fine of 700,000 won, respectively.

2. The above fine is imposed on the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the building of the Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, and Defendant B is the wife of Defendant A, and the victim E is a person who operates a factory of a mutual household of “G” from the F located next to the above D loan.

1. At around 10:00 on November 10, 2012, the Defendants’ co-principal defendants suffered from the Defendant and the Defendant were in the process of trial as a matter of restoration to the said D lending parking lot, which was damaged by the victim’s transfer in front of the instant “G” factory. The Defendant A took the victim’s bath while drinking the victim, and Defendant B took the victim’s shoulder once in drinking, and Defendant B took the victim’s walk up three times in drinking, and caused the victim’s injury to the said factory entrance. In sum, the Defendants suffered from approximately 12-day medical treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Defendant B, around September 20, 2012, at around 09:30, requested the movement of a vehicle parked by the Defendant in front of the road in front of the road in which the Defendant was parked, the Defendant 2 expressed the victim’s desire to do so, and assaulted the victim by pushing the part of the vehicle in his hand.

Summary of Evidence

【Joint Injury】

1. The statement that Defendant A and E, among the witness H’s legal statement, were tightly and recognified, and that the situation becomes worse due to the involvement of Defendant B;

1. Although some of the witness E statements were exaggerated in the second trial records, the part concerning the facts constituting the crime in the judgment is judged to be reliable in conformity with witness I. It appears to be in an I neutral position, and the contents of the statement in the police and the court are consistent and credibility. The statement corresponding thereto is consistent.

1. Statements corresponding thereto in part of the medical certificate of injury (the nine pages of investigation records);

1. Results of fact inquiry into red convalescent hospitals (the point of violence);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the statements made by witnesses E and J in the second trial records;

1. Criminal facts;