logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.20 2018나28619
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The basic facts;

2. The assertion of the claim for damages and the reasons for the court's explanation of this part are as follows: "Management Body" in Part 3, Part 5, Part 3, Part 2, Part 18, and Part 3, part 13, part 3, part 16, part 5, and part 5, part 5, 6, and 7, part 5, "No evidence exists that the plaintiff had interfered with the business of the store of this case due to the construction of this case, and that part 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 11-1, 1, 5, and 13, 5, 5, 5, 16, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, 5, etc.

3. As to a request for a declaration of consent with respect to construction to replace fire walls with fire air conditioners

A. Since the fire wall installed between the Plaintiff’s assertion store and escalator does not have been removed during the construction process of the instant case and there are enormous obstacles to the business of the instant store, the Defendant management body is obligated to express its consent with respect to the construction of replacing the said fire wall to a fire airr.

B. According to the results of the evidence No. 14, No. 14, and No. 4’s video, and the on-site verification by this court, the fact that fire walls are installed between the instant store and escalators.

arrow