1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 26,717,265 as well as 20% per annum from April 4, 2014 to the date of complete payment.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff’s employment by the Defendant and provided labor from July 1, 201 to March 20, 2014 may be acknowledged as having not been paid KRW 26,717,265 from the Defendant’s total wages and retirement allowances.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 26,717,265 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from April 4, 2014 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the 14th day after the retirement of the plaintiff.

2. As to the judgment of the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim should be resolved according to the rehabilitation procedure, since the Defendant was subjected to a preservative measure decision and comprehensive injunction in the rehabilitation case No. 2015 Ma13, Seoul Central District Court

The plaintiff's claim of this case is based on the worker's wage and retirement allowance, i.e., public-interest claims, and public-interest claims should be repaid from time to time without undergoing rehabilitation procedures (Articles 179(1)10 and 180(1) of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act). Thus, the defendant's assertion on a different premise is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.