logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2015가단5353551
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Around March 10, 2013, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion concluded a lease agreement with Defendant C, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 3,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 200,000, and the lease term of KRW 2 years from April 21, 2013, on real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement.” However, since the Defendants paid the tea from July 2013 to pay it, they did not pay it more than twice, the instant lease agreement is terminated, and the Defendants seek the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the delivery of the instant real estate and the return of the rent.

2. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone that the Plaintiff set the lease term of the instant lease from April 21, 2013 to two years.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants were in arrears not less than twice, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

arrow