1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

While the Plaintiff was working at the Ccafeteria located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “instant place of business”), on July 11, 2014, the cleaning agent was placed in the main room around 15:40 on July 11, 2014 and was cut off the floor while being moved.

(2) On July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a medical care application with the Defendant on July 14, 2014 (hereinafter “instant accident”). However, on August 21, 2014, the Defendant approved the medical care of the Plaintiff on the ground that the instant disease constitutes a chronical chronological chronron, chronum, chronum, chronum, and chronum chronum, but did not approve the medical care for the instant disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleading of this case as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, although it is obvious that the injury and disease of this case occurred due to the accident of this case, the disposition of this

Judgment

1. The term "occupational accident" in the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act means the injury, disease, physical disability, or death of a worker who was caused by the worker's work while performing his/her duties. Thus, there should be causation between the work and the disaster, and the method and degree of proof should be proved by the direct evidence. The method and degree of proof must be proved to the extent that the proximate causal relation between the work and the accident can be inferred by indirect facts, such as the health condition at the time of employment, the existence of existing diseases, the nature of the work and the environment of the worker, and the transfer of the same disease of another worker who worked at the same workplace, not by direct evidence.