logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.07.17 2014나24756
자동차소유권이전등록절차이행
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the member of the party cited in the judgment of the court of first instance explained concerning the instant case are as follows: “Plaintiffs July 20, 2001” under Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “Plaintiffs July 23, 2001.” The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance has completed the attachment registration of 111.

“109 seizures have been completed.” Except for the case where “109 seizures have been completed, 30,000 won and 30,000 won from the date on which a new registration has been completed” as “from the date on which a new registration has been completed” as “the date on which a new registration has been completed”, it is identical to the description in the column for reasons for the judgment of the first instance

2. As such, the part of the plaintiff's claim for confirmation is unlawful, and the claim for acceptance of the transfer of ownership registration procedure is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow