Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On December 13, 2018, at the front of the C District located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported by a taxi engineer to the effect that “the son takes a bath on a taxi and spits spite on a taxi”; (b) landed from a taxi according to the recommendation of a policeman D or policeman affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station C District D, which called the Seoul Western Police Station, and then, (c) took a bath, such as “the son spite, spite,” etc., to police officers requesting the son to return to the roadway, and (d) assaulted E’s right knee and left hand on one occasion by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports;

1. Relevant provisions of criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: In light of the background leading up to the instant crime, the means and method thereof, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the crime was committed, etc., which can be identified by the evidence adopted and investigated by the court, the determination of the purport of the claim of mental retardation under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act cannot be deemed to have been in a state where the Defendant had the ability to discern things under the influence

The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the reason for sentencing, the background of the crime, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties, the fact that the defendant repents the defendant's mistake, the criminal records of the defendant, the age, sex, and environment