logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고정664
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:30 on May 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the 1st floor of Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, the Defendant claimed the victim for the reason that the victim E (47 tax) who was known to the city and the immediately preceding telephone would dispute the victim's vehicle repair cost; and (b) on the ground that the victim's vehicle repair cost became chemicalized, the Defendant purchased the victim's cell phone on one occasion with the cell phone with the victim's left end, and when the victim's face was 2:3 times a week.

결국 피고인은 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 얼굴의 의 깸 손 상( 좌측) 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation (on-site mobilization conditions);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to the evidence prior to the determination on the argument that the Defendant’s act of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act constitutes a legitimate defense, the following facts can be sufficiently recognized: (a) the Defendant’s act of having been kept in his/her hand prices the victim’s left side on one occasion; (b) the victim’s face was taken on two to three occasions by drinking; and (c) the materials alone constituted a defense act by the Defendant’s aforementioned act, which is socially significant.

It is difficult to see that it constitutes a political party’s defense.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.

arrow