logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2012.11.16 2012고정781
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the driver of a cargo vehicle B ton.

On May 18, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 21:30 on May 18, 2012, and directed the intersection in front of the Gocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, at the sacheon-si, to the sacheon Agricultural and Fishery Product Wholesale Market

Since there is no traffic control at all places, in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there is a cross-road vehicle by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping the motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely;

Nevertheless, when the defendant was negligent in proceeding without properly examining the right before and after, the defendant left the left from the right side of the defendant's running direction at the Yayang-eaeng-Eup Do, the victim C (33 years of age) driven by the victim C (the victim) who turn to the left from the Yayang-eng-eng-eng-eng-eng-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-e-kak-kak-e-kak

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition, evidence and photographs at the scene of a traffic accident, the ledger of driver's license, car inquiry, and estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good, it takes into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, result, etc.

arrow