logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.22 2015고단963
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2015 Godan963,” is a person who operates the "D," at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yandong-gu, Seoul, with a view to acquiring money from customers who have been able to complete the debt of himself/herself.

1. Around July 29, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim E told the victim E to “I will make his/her new dependent on the model, and send 9,400,000 won of educational expenses to the F account of his/her employees.”

However, the Defendant was thought to have prepared funds to repay the amount equivalent to KRW 140 million from the beginning. Since F was a man living together with the Defendant, there was no relationship with the model industry, even if he received money from the Defendant, he did not have the intent or ability to make the victim’s dependent on the model.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim and received KRW 9,400,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account of F on that day, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around October 7, 2014, the Defendant against the victim H expressed that “The victim H had the right to sell an apartment that is located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in the event that he/she became a real estate seller (a single real estate seller) even though he/she had the right to sell an apartment.” The Defendant held that the Defendant would sell the subject money with a premium attached to the sale right after the month when he/she purchased the right to sell.”

However, the Defendant was thought to have prepared funds to repay the amount equivalent to KRW 140 million from the beginning, and there was no fact that the Defendant acquired the right to sell an apartment building in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu. Therefore, even if he received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to seek the right to sell the apartment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim and received KRW 20,000,000 from the victim’s foreign exchange bank account (I) on that day, as well as from around that time until January 5, 2015, was committed in attached list (1).

arrow